"FAITH ONLY" BY DYREL W. COLLINS
The doctrine of eternal salvation by "faith only" is a cherished
and often accepted means of obtaining all the promises of God.
The doctrine of "faith only" also often, but not always, would
claim that once salvation is procured by faith that salvation
cannot be lost or forfeited by any future act or conduct of the
believer.
The doctrine of salvation by "faith only" is often stated in
various ways. A preacher, who believes the doctrine of "faith only,"
many times will tell a person desiring salvation to, "JUST
ACCEPT CHRIST AS YOUR PERSONAL SAVIOUR, AND YOU
WILL BE SAVED." (note: NO APOSTLE EVER SAID THIS TO ONE
WHO WANTED TO BE SAVED.) He then will tell that person to
pray what is called the "sinner's prayer" in which one confesses
that he is a sinner, acknowledges that Christ is the Saviour and
thanks God for his salvation.
In public debate the doctrine of "faith only" has been stated
thusly, "THE SCRIPTURES TEACH THAT FAITH IN CHRIST
PROCURES SALVATION WITHOUT FURTHER ACTS OF
OBEDIENCE." This was affirmed by L.S. Ballard in the debate
with Thomas B. Warren in Fort Worth, Texas. The intent of the
debate was primarily to deny the necessity of water baptism
as a necessary part of salvation from past sins. The
implication of this doctrine of "faith only", however reaches
much deeper into other Bibical requierments when taken at
face value.
A person must be extremely careful when quoting the Word
of God and make sure that the quote is exact. In the garden of
Eden for example, The Devil only added one word to what
God had said and brought death, heartache, and misery
upon future generations. God said that Adam and Eve were not
to eat o the fruit from the "Tree of Life" and if they did , they
would die. The Devil said, ""you shall not surely die."
The Devil only added the one word "NOT" to what God said.
God said, ""You will die" and the Devil said, "you will NOT
die." Truth was changed to a lie simply by adding one word.
As a result of man believing a lie he was put out of the Garden
of Eden and no longer had access to the "Tree of Life". Why
do babies die? Why does anyone die? The simple answer is that
eternal life and access to the "Tree of Life" was forfeited when
man believed a lie and rejected what God said. The apostle Paul
would state the consequence of Adam's sin by saying that,
"in Adam, all die."
If it is true that by "faith only" on the part of the believer he
procures or obtains salvation, then what about the Bible
statements which indicate additional requierments? Are there
acts of obedience necessary to obtain the approval of God?
This is the real question which must be answered when
discussing salvation by "faith only." The doctrine of "faith
only" is often connected with an additional doctrine. The
additional doctrine has to do with future sin and
salvation. It is maintained that once a person is saved, he
cannot so sin as to be lost. This doctrine is often described
as "the impossibility of apostasy," "Once saved always saved."
"Once in grace, always in grace", "The eternal security of the
believer", or some other such terminology.
The following three passages along with many others, that
could be quoted, prove the fallacy of "once saved always
saved." Matthew 7:21 shows the necessity of doing the will
of the Father. Revelation 2:10 says, "Be faithful even to the
point of death." Hebrews 5:9 says that Christ is "The source of
eternal salvation to all who obey Him." It is clear that acts
or deeds are essential to continue to do the will of the
Father and be faithful.
Does salvation by,"faith only" negate all the other Bibical
commandments and requirements? This is a legitimate
question arising from the concept of "faith only" and must be
answered. To answer the question, we must define the meaning
of the word, "only". While there various uses of the word "only",
in connection with people and things, it is most often in an
exclusive manner and certainly not in an inclusive manner. Thus
"only" may be defined as simply, "The single thing involved in a
situation." It signifies that which stands alone, seperate and
apart from every thing else.
The following questions must be asked:
1. I s there a passage that uses the terminology "faith alone"? The
answer is "YES"!
The passage however, does not support the doctrine of
salvation by "faith only" for the passages read, "What good is it
my brothers if a man claims to have faith, but has no deeds. Can such
faith save him?" V14... "You foolish man do you want evidence that
faith without deeds is useless ?" V 20... "you see that a person
is justified by what he does and NOT BY FAITH ALONE" V 24 ... "As
the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead."
V 26. (James 2:14-26)
These passages alone are sufficient to refute the doctrine of "faith only".
But we shall examine it further and add additional weight to the truth
stated above.
2. Does the Bible say that we are saved or justified by faith? The
answer is, "YES." This is found in several passages, one is Acts 16:31.
3. Does the Bible say that we are saved by " faith only or alone?"
"NO!"
4. Does the Bible say that we are saved or justified by something
other than Faith"? YES!
There are at least fourteen things by which
the Bible says we are saved. It should, however, be noted that
in no case is the word "only" used in connection with any of the
things mentioned.
What are the things by which the Bible says that we
are saved or justified?
God, Preaching, belief- 1 Corintians 1:21
Grace, faith- Ephesians 2:8
Jesus, 1 Timothy 1:15
Jesus' life, Jesus' death- Romans 5:10
Blood, Romans 5:9
Word, James 1:21
Love of the truth, 2 Thessalonians 2:10
Faith, Acts 16:31
Baptism, 1 Peter 3:21
Calling on the name of the Lord, Romans 10:13
Hope, Romans 8:24
Obedience, Hebrews 5:8-9
5. Would it be accurate to say that we are saved by baptism?
"YES"
Would it be accurate to say that we are saved by "baptism
only"? NO!
There are those who teach that we are saved by baptism alone. Who
does this? Everyone who teacher infant baptism. An infant is
incapable of hearing and forming a belief, he is incapable of
repenting and confessing Christ as Lord and he is taken without
his consent and has water sprinkled or poured on his head.
(Some assume that sprinkling or pouring water on the candidate
is Bible baptism. There is no Bible authority for this.) If this is not
salvation by "baptism only", one would be hard pressed to define
it otherwise.
6. Does the great commission to the Apostles suggest the idea of
"faith only" as a means of salvation? NO! Again it is not clear
that both belief and baptism are required before salvation is
obtained, Christ said, "Whoever believes and is baptised will
be saved."
It is interesting to note that the generally perceived Christian
World is divided into three groups. Each group may best be defined
by their correct or incorrect arrangement of the Great Commission
recorded in Mark 16:16.
Christ said, "Whoever BELIEVES and is BAPTIZED will be
SAVED."
"Faith only" says, "Whoever BELIEVES is SAVED and can be
BAPTIZED later."
"Baptism only" says, "Whoever is BAPTIZED is SAVED and
BELIEVES later."
CONCLUSION:
If "faith only" is all that is required to obtain eternal salvation,
which salvation then cannot in any way be lost what about other
apparent commands. What about the command to: obey, assemble
together, repent, confess, be baptized, pray, sing, give, partake of
the Lord's supper, add to our faith, virtue, knowledge, temperance,
patience and Godliness?
IT SHOULD BE EVIDENT TO EVERY PERSON THAT FAITH IS
NECESSARY TO HAVE SALVATION, BUT THE FAITH THAT SAVES
IS THE FAITH THAT OBEYS. FAITH IS THE REASON FOR OUR
OBEDIENCE. "FAITH ONLY" is NOT a BIBLE DOCTRINE.
"Faith only" cannot be proved by quoting passages that
mention faith, but have no additional commandments
included in the verse. Would such passages exclude the necessity
to love God? Some would argue that since additional
commandments were not included in the same verse they are
not necessary to obtain salvation.
"Faith only" is just as false as the doctrine of "Baptism
only." The same arguments that are used to try to prove one
can be used to try and prove the other.
DYREL W. COLLINS

Leave a comment